Nieman Journalism Lab has a very interesting overview over how the internet is influencing sportswriting -- a genre of storytelling that passionately and peculiarly straddles the future, past, and present tenses. Of the innovations that writer Tim Carmody looks at, I'm especially enthused about SportsFeat, a spin-off sister site from the crew at Longform.org. As you might expect, SportsFeat curates longform sports journalism -- primarily contemporary pieces, but classic ones as well. Today on the front page, there are links to an essay on Magic Johnson, two decades after the basketball great announced he was HIV-positive; a profile on the competition to make the most prestigious drill team in Texas; and an obituary for wrestler Randy Savage. Interesting ... though I intend to make active use of the "suggest a story" feature.
The Nieman profile pulls out some ideas about how sportswriting is evolving, fed by multimedia phenomenons. Pointing to Quickish and Grantland, among other platforms, Carmody writes:
If there’s a common thread to all of these moves, it’s hybridization and metastasis. The tools that drive compelling sports journalism on the web aren’t limited to sports. Nor are they exclusively held by sportswriters working for independent media companies.
Meaning, the "sports pages" aren't the sole site for these kind of narratives. Okay. Hybridization seems to be what's happening to everything, everywhere, as a result of the web; it's certainly not unique to sportswriting. But there is an interesting implication here: as community-building as sports are (I wrote about that here and here), it can of course be cliquish. And these cliques aren't just divided by whose jerseys they wear or what leagues they follow, but also across tenuous lines on who a "real" fan is and isn't.
Don't know the names of the players? Can't for the life of you figure out what "offsides" means in soccer, but still enjoy watching people play a game once in awhile? A lot of stats-vomiting fans will not count you as a "real" lover of the games, with the same vehemence that indie music fans guard their territory. This is silly, of course, and I like to think that this "hybridization and metastasis" might have the effect of blurring the lines that currently surround the various cliques by providing more ways for more people to participate. That is, it might disintegrate any old-fashioned barriers ("What?! You don't know who Sonny Liston is?!") and create a more welcoming place for the casual or skeptical fan to engage with the potent, powerful, beautiful stories of sports. (I wrote about that too.)
More from Carmody:
And as hungry as fans are for quick takes and real-time updates, they’re equally hungry for history of the game and the stories that shaped how we see it. Longform/SportsFeat co-founder Aaron Lammer explains the hunger for old stories for a generation accustomed to tracking down and collecting the best of the past:
Everyone has that one standout piece that gets seared into their skull, so it was exciting, when someone mentioned one, to actually be able to track it down and pass it around. For me, the process echoed the early days of MP3s, when out of print and ultra-rare recordings that had been stuck in record industry purgatory all started making the rounds. Except with long-form stories, the whole thing is amplified, because most of these pieces have totally dropped off the map. [emphasis mine]
And with a hundred and one ways to get the day’s stats and highlights and deals and signings, including directly from the teams themselves, anywhere and everywhere, there’s a premium on well-curated, extended, critical profiles and analysis — especially when we have time to sit and read.
I love the counter-intuitiveness of this. Most folks think that a wired culture is lulling us into a satisfaction with stories with the depth of a tweet or text message ... and yet, here we are not only acknowledging a hunger for longer, contextual, dynamic stories, but we're acting on them. We're seeking them. And we're using that very wired-ness of our culture to do it. This isn't a theory: while I'm new to SportsFeat, I've watched with delight (and participation) in the simultaneous flourishing of Longform, Longreads, Read It Later, and Lady Journos, among other narrative journalism innovations. The audience for this stuff is huge. And even for a genre of storytelling that is unusually data-driven and present-tense -- sports pages are traditionally recognizable for their box scores; sports television by their ticker-tape updates -- this, too, is a natural progression of the way we tell, and read, and share, the stories of sports. Frankly, it's a good time to be a fan.